Camille Anguenot, passionate about riding, met Théo Decouchant in a nightclub in mid-November 2021. On November 29, she invited this discreet and attentive 23-year-old to spend the evening at her home in Oiselay-et – Grachaux. , small Haute-Saône commune, between Vesoul and Besançon. According to her statements, they fell asleep in the same bed, but she was woken up at night by the caresses of the young man whom she rejected.
Use the boys
“Enraged” at his insistence, she allegedly took a knife to stab him in the abdomen, before going to get a dress belt in his room to strangle him to death. When Théo is dead, Camille Anguenot wraps him in garbage bags sealed with heavy brown tape and locks the body in the closet in the living room. During the night, she sent a message to her victim's mobile phone: 'Thanks for last night, it was really good. Take care on the road and see you soon.”
She then uses the deceased's car and bank card to go about her life as if nothing had happened, even though she does not have a driver's license. In particular, he will join a new lover in Bordeaux, then an old one in Dijon. Concerned that she had no news of her son, the young man's mother reported him missing, and his sister spoke to Camille Anguenot. She claims Théo left the day after their night together and shares the boy's search notice on Facebook.
But a week later, investigators discovered the body left in the home's closet. In police custody, she admits that she considered Théo Decouchant to be her “dove”. He also confesses to using boys to get money or to get around. The lawyer of the victim's family, Christophe Bernard, criticizes the accused's version of sexual assault. “She knows Théo was in love with her. She wants her car to go meet a new boyfriend, so she lures him to her,” says the board, which emphasizes the “perversity” of the young woman.
“She downplays the facts”
She “minimizes the facts” and “organises to hide what she has done”. “Furthermore, Camille Anguenot did not express many regrets during the hearings,” Me Bernard notes. Regrets that premeditation was not accepted. Whether or not the accused's judgment was impaired during the act will be at the heart of the debate. Two psychiatric assessments are opposed: one detects a “characteristic personality” but no change in discernment, while the other describes “psychopathic traits” that could have generated an “impairment of his discernment.”