The lawyer also assures that the investigation is prospective: 'Unfortunately, it is not entirely unusual for many procedures to start as a real one'fishing expedition' against the person under investigation, under the pretext of clarifying a particular criminal offense, but in reality what they are looking for is research the life and work of the subject to see if other crimes can be discovered in the course of the investigation, based on the investigating officer's personal belief about the subject's criminality.
Public
The Court's ruling, which the lawyer cites, specifies that, “on the basis of the foregoing considerations and the examination of the content of the complaint, there is a first improbable factual block or with incorrect dataanother, referring to the rescue of Globalia in which the connection of the suspect, with the available data, is a simple suspicion (…) and a final block, referring to support for the joint venture formed by Innova Next SLU in which sufficient objective data seem to legitimize the start of the investigation”.
As the lawyer explains, despite having in black and white what he could investigate and what he could not investigate, Judge Peinado continued to approve procedures outside of what the Court had said it could investigate. In the opinion of Gómez's defense: “These rulings that approve of the previous procedures, which have been appealed by this party and by the Public Prosecutor's Office, ultimately show that The investigator plans to expand the investigation beyond what the Provincial Court ruled in its order issued just over a month ago.“.
“Certainly, Facts are being investigated for which the Provincial Court has already ruled that there was insufficient evidence and this without any elements other than those contained in the original complaint having been provided. Since the only thing that is different is the dozens of documents presented by the five private accusations, some of which refer to procedural issues arising from their appearance, and others are accusations, including some plus press news and documentation that does not provide evidence regarding the conduct of my client,” he continues.
And he adds that “perhaps the most remarkable thing about all this is that the practice of the above-mentioned procedure, recently agreed upon by the Court, goes against the very literal wording of the Order's dictum to which this appeal relates. And this not only because it follows the practice of due diligence with regard to issues that, according to the order of the Provincial Court, fall outside the scope of this procedure, but also because it is contrary to the operative part of the order against which we are appealing today.”
The writing
It also appears in Camacho's writing, to which ElPlural.com has had access: “Although no investigation procedure has been carried out that has yielded new evidence, since the UCO report was conclusive and the statements of the journalists. They have not provided any evidence to the In the current case regarding the original complaint of Manos Cleans, the investigative body has agreed to carry out new procedures that have nothing to do with Begoña Gómez, such as the request for information about contracts from the Madrid City Council to Air Europa when The Provincial Court has already clarified that there was no need to investigate anything regarding his relationship with Globalia“.
And he adds: “That is to say, of the three blocks of facts mentioned in the complaint, the Court considered that there was only sufficient evidence to investigate the facts related to the award of the contracts by RED.ES to the UTE formed by Innova Next SLU and The Valley Business School. With regard to these events, the Provincial Court considered that the investigation could continue. not so compared to the other two blocks“.
Follow us on WhatsApp and receive the best news and most interesting stories