In this regard, it indicates that this cost reduction is taking place “by not guaranteeing a professional salary in accordance with the working day performedand by being able to stop paying to social security the amounts corresponding to the labour contributions of such people.”
Furthermore, in his letter he recalls that the Supreme Court, like other courts, employment nature between Glovo and its employeesjust like twenty courts that have established that ratio, mostly in dismissal procedures.
“Despite all of the above, Glovo continues to maintain the same working relationship with its employeeseven after 01/12/2023, who are still forced to register as self-employed and pay their own contributions if they want to continue providing services for the company,” the Public Prosecutor's Office said.
“It undermines and suppresses” rights
All this “constitutes a practice not permitted by labor laws and the like undermines and suppresses the rights that it recognises employees as workers in respect of salary, working hours, breaks, permits, holidays or social security protection”.
The Public Prosecution Service alludes to the demands of the Labor Inspectorate check whether the employment relationship as an employee has been recognized by Glovoa company that “has not proven any of the above points in its answers and has limited itself to the answer that the original relationship uniting the parties had not been maintained at the time of the request.”
