In the complaint ElPlural.com had access to, and which goes to distribution though it will end by accumulation on the judge's table Juan Carlos PeinadoHazte Oír states that Complutense University does not usually commission the creation of software unless it is for something very complex, but that 'the defendant met with directors of Indra, Telefónica and Google to ask them to develop an application for the Master of Competitive Social Transformation that he directs at the Complutense University of Madrid. And they started developing such software, investing an amount of almost 150,000 euros, although they did not complete the application, either because of a possible conflict of interest or because of the business involvement. of duration, and their participation did not cover the platform's future support and corrective or evolutionary maintenance needs.”
They add that by the end of 2022 Indra's relationship with the chairman of the Master of Competitive Social Transformation has broken downand that “at the moment when the Human Age Institute announces its inclusion in the Extraordinary Chair for Competitive Social Transformation of the Complutense University of Madrid.”
For the far-right group, Begoña Gómez would be a appropriation by registering the software as your property for the creation and subsequent registration in the commercial register of a sole proprietorship (100% of the shares owned by the defendant) of a company called Transforma TSC, SL, this acrostic TSC, corresponds to Transformación Social Competitiva.
They also believe that drawing up the technical specifications of the contract for “Technical and technological assistance and advisory service for the creation of a management and impact measurement platform for small and medium-sized businesses at the Complutense University of Madrid” could be a crime are. because Gómez, according to them, “it is not functional (neither career nor interim) and has no studies or qualifications (let alone membership) in computer engineering.”
And they further confirm that “the website does not contain the mandatory information about the ownership of the website, commercial information, data protection, cookies, etc., which causes confusion”, and that therefore “The facts show that there was conscious and intentional behavior on the part of the suspect.“since, according to the complaint, “the appropriation of the trademarks, the use of the company's name and the alleged use of the program created by this company indicate the existence of a crime of misappropriation, in addition to a possible embezzlement of public funds without the university's knowledge; or a scam if you didn't know.