The judge investigating the Public Prosecutor's Office for the denial to Miguel Ángel Rodríguez about Ayuso's partner questions the Attorney General

The judge of the Supreme Court of Madrid (TSJM) investigating the case opened against two prosecutors in Madrid for issuing a statement to deny false information about research double tax crime against Ayuso's partner describes the request of the Attorney General, Álvaro García Ortiz, as “extra-procedural” that this procedure is being investigated by the Supreme Court. This is stated in an order in which judge Francisco José Goyena gives the parties a period of ten days to make allegations about that document.

Furthermore, the judge emphasizes that “under no circumstances should it be regarded as necessary [a comparecer en esta causa] the Attorney General of the State, as no agreement has been reached on this within the current procedure, and this instructor could not do so either, given his status as a judge at the House of Representatives of the Supreme Court,” he emphasizes. However, he confirms that he is transferring his writings to the parties because of their “possible meaning” and for “a basic reason of loyalty and protecting the rights of the parties in person.”

García Ortiz sent a letter to the TSJM this week to remind that he took charge of the distribution of the press release denying the Miguel Ángel Rodríguez hoax and that the aforementioned court has no jurisdiction to investigate it, since she is in court. High Council. . This writing came about after the instructor issued a series of procedures, including identifying the “most responsible” for the dissemination of the aforementioned statement.

In case this was not clear from his previous statements, García Ortiz recalled that the statement would not have been made public without his prior consent and without his “express and direct” instructions. He also reiterated that the note was issued “to put an end to a hoax and protect a colleague and extraordinary prosecutor,” the instructor of the tax fraud and falsification of documents case of Ayuso's partner, and to comply with the obligation of the prosecutor. Agency to provide truthful information to citizens. He also recalled that the aforementioned note does not add anything that had not previously been published in various media, in some cases citing sources close to the person under investigation.

Source link

Leave a Comment

shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw