The Public Prosecution of the National Court is also asking for amnesty for the Tsunami terrorism

The prosecutor responsible for the Tsunami Democràtic case at the National Court, Miguel Ángel Carballo, has spoken out in favor of applying the amnesty to all those under investigation for alleged terrorist crimes, because he believes that there are no reasons for the case to leave them outside the cloak of oblivion in the conditions established by law. And there are none, because he understands that not even the death of a tourist near the El Prat airport in Barcelona, ​​​​when the Tsunami besieged it; The serious injuries suffered by the three police officers assigned to Barcelona and who are the private prosecutor in the case are also not attributable to the suspect.

This position is not surprising, not only because the prosecutor, who is now head of the Public Prosecutor's Office of Ciudad Real but is still handling the case, has not seen any terrorist crimes and has appealed the decisions of Judge Manuel García in this regard- Castellon. . But because that same Tuesday, the number 2 of the Public Prosecutor's Office, María Ángeles Sánchez Conde, and one of the heads of the Criminal Court of the Supreme Court, Joaquín Sánchez Covisa, demanded total amnesty for those prosecuted there, also in connection with the Democratic Tsunami , demanded the measured Carles Puigdemont and Ruben Wagensberg.

In its report to the National Court, the prosecutor focuses on the indictment issued by the judge last November, the only one of its kind included in the summary. After analyzing the facts he uncovers and highlighting those that have not been investigated, such as those related to the injuries suffered by the three police officers in person, he concludes that the amnesty law “applies” . “No progress has been made in the investigation and no specific people have been charged in connection with these events,” he said.

Regarding the death of the tourist, who died of a heart attack after walking four kilometers to access the terminal from which his flight departed, the prosecutor claims that “no causal link has been proven with the activity carried out by the Tsunami was called” to block the El Prat. airport “and obviously in no case can it be intentional, given the absolute unpredictability of the death.” “There is no information on the severity of injuries, without prejudice to the fact that those who were largely injured were the protesters themselves as a result of their own attack,” he added.

It thus concludes that “there is no evidence of the commission of malicious acts by any of the persons investigated causing death, abortion, injury to the fetus or loss of a useful organ or member, as well as impotence, infertility or serious deformity” , what would be the causes of exclusion in the application of the amnesty. In his opinion, the death of the tourist has “no causal link with the concentration evoked by Tsunami and even less: it can be attributed to one of those investigated as fraud.”

“The same can be said of the injuries sustained by people present at the airport or by police officers injured during a demonstration not directly called for by the Tsunami, where, as the injured police explain, the organizers were arrested (none of the persons under investigation), and without the intentional responsibility of the suspect, including the General Secretary of the ERC, Marta Rovira, or the head of Carles Puigdemont's office, Josep Lluis Alay, being attributable under any circumstances.

SCC: “Incompatible with EU law”

“Despite the characterization maintained by the investigator and contradicted by this Ministry, considering the events as terrorism, it is not appreciated that the events, even hypothetically, deliberately caused serious violations of human rights, especially those are governed by Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which, as is well known, refers to the right to life and the right not to be tortured or subjected to degrading treatment,” he emphasizes.

Catalan civil society, it is often claimed, does not see it that way. He presented a document directly asking the judge to refer a preliminary question to the Court of Justice of the European Union on the application of the amnesty law to crimes presumed to be terrorism, as this could be contrary to the European directives on combating terrorism. against this behavior.

In a letter accessed by ABC, she requests that “the suspension of the proceedings is agreed in relation to the application of the amnesty law until the preliminary question has been resolved, in order to avoid the application of a rule that could be incompatible with EU legislation and thus guarantee the rights of victims and the integrity of the judicial process.

Source link

Leave a Comment

shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw shw