There is no room in the judicial circus for so many acrobats

Juan Carlos Peinado slowly got up from his chair and quickly pulled out his holster. He almost shot his head off. He had not been very happy when Begoña Gómez spent so little time in his courtroom on Friday, because he had not bothered to inform him of any of the complaints. The ploy to suggest that he would testify anyway after a quick reading of the contents in the hallway had failed. Now he would not escape. On the occasion of the videoconference of businessman Carlos Barrabés as a witness, he wanted to force her to appear in court, with the risk of being arrested if she did not appear. Let's see who can deny him the headlines after that reckless move.

Barrabés’ serious health condition had required him to testify as “pre-fabricated evidence” so that the recording could be used in the trial without his future presence. But why was the threat made against Gómez? “The absence of the duly summoned person investigated will not prevent the obtaining of pre-fabricated evidence, even though his legal defense must be present in any case,” it reads. Article 449a of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This presence is necessary to guarantee the suspect's right to defend himself, but it is not even essential to continue the interrogation. If the defense attorney decides not to appear, the judge can call on a lawyer appointed by the court.

Two hours later, Peinado had to retreat. He could summon Barrabés personally, since he had already been dismissed, and there he took the opportunity to no longer consider it as “pre-fabricated evidence”, so that Gómez would not be forced to be present. It is one thing to be the banner of the right's war against Moncloa, but quite another to threaten a suspect.

Although there is no hard evidence against the president’s wife – or so the UCO, which sent its report to the judge, believes – there is always the possibility of public humiliation. Peinado had been carried away by the passion of the hooligan who wants his team to win the game, both civil and criminal.

When Borja Sémper began his press conference at the PP headquarters, the judge had already made the second decision. The spokesman for the Popular Party knew he would have to talk about the attention given to immigrant minors by the regional governments and the threats of Vox to break up their coalition governments with his party. Beforehand, he made sure to mention a topic in case they didn’t ask him about it.

I had to say at least a few sentences about Begoña Gómez. He chose what happened on the day of his aborted testimony. “She went to testify surrounded by a huge police shield, to avoid an uncomfortable photo, a photo of shame,” said Sémper.

The fact is that it was not the police who prevented images of Gómez from being taken in the building. The ban on taking photos in the corridors of the Plaza Castilla courts is in force regardless of the identity of the person called to testify as a defendant or witness, as journalists who know the rules well know. It seems that Sémper felt very bad that no photos were taken of her and that is why she thinks there were too many police officers. You can't put on a great show under these conditions, and that too Some ultras have broken all the rules.


These are days when the judges who are on everyone’s lips can’t stomach so much stardom. Peinado has never seen anything like it and has to enjoy every moment, so he can easily shoot without aiming. At the National Court, Manuel García Castellón has been involved in many battles and it is not the first time that he has attracted the attention of the media or bitten the dust.

This time he swallowed an entire forest path. He kept the instructions for the Tsunami box on the fridge for later use He forgot to take it out before it expired. The judge's one-day stay in 2021 was unlawful and he is now forced to close the case.

His hopes of preventing the application of the amnesty to Carles Puigdemont by investigating him on a terrorism charge were dashed. On Tuesday, The Supreme Court closed the casewho had come to him because of the arrest of the ex-president. Before the extension, “there was no investigation into the case”, that is, the judge did nothing about Puigdemont. There was only a sudden resurrection when the amnesty law was negotiated. Legal miracles.

Not all the magistrates who are part of the show are so sleepy. The judge of Barcelona Joaquín Aguirre had an urgent outburst and on Tuesday he sent the case to the Supreme Court for the alleged Russian plot, for which he wants to accuse Puigdemont of treason, which would prevent him from benefiting from the amnesty. Aguirre is not stupid. He had seen how the National Court had cut off García Castellón’s wings by accepting an appeal from the defense, and he did not want to allow the same to happen to him.

He had yet to complete the “essential part” of the separate section of the briefing that had opened recently, on June 21. He had not done much about it. What the defense had done was to appeal to the Barcelona Court against their decision to reactivate the Russian plot. Aguirre did not want to wait for the answer.

The facts attributed to Puigdemont and others are the same ones that have been known for years. Up until now, they had not helped the judge to bring the case to court. It will come as no surprise that at this moment you can package it and invoice it to the Supreme Court.

Judicial creativity is not without risks, as García Castellón has shown. But in the case of him and Aguirre, it cannot be denied that this tendency to preserve cases in formaldehyde until they can be useful has generated a large dose of positive headlines in certain press. They will always say that they are not looking for fame or recognition. Nor will they accept that their decisions are suspected of bias in favour of the opposition.

They are the right's favorite judges, for reasons that are clear to everyone. What cannot be denied is that they are sweating so that the amnesty does not become a reality.

Source link

Leave a Comment

mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt mdt