What did the “morning” show about the former president? “The finance officer.”

After the former president Ernesto Zedillo criticized its approval reform of the judiciary and we confirm that our the country is moving towards tyrannythe president Andrés Manuel López Obrador answered morning conference.

As every Wednesday, the section was presented A who's who of lies Elizabeth García Vilchis, where it was exhibited for the occasion the “dirty laundry” of the PRI's six-year mandate.

“It would be worthwhile to refresh the memory of former President Zedillo for all that he said,” Vilchis said. Some of the former president's “dirty laundry”:

• Closed the Supreme Court The Nation's Judiciary (SCJN) on 1 January 1995.
• He retired at the age of 26 ministers with quite “juicy” pensions, said Vilchis.
• He reformed the constitution in 26 days.
• He announced the reform of 20 constitutional articles.
• He abolished the court, It is made up of ministers appointed by former presidents Miguel de la Madrid and Carlos Salinas de Gortari. “He prescribed a court and kept his mouth shut by saying it should be an autonomous power,” he recalled. Elizabeth Garcia Vilchis.
• He appointed the 11 ministers of the SCJN. He created the judicial council and half of the first instance judges.

Also at his conference AMLO also responded to Zedillo the Morena's alleged majority in the Senate, after the 2024 elections.

He said that the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) had 95 mandates in the Senate during Zedillo's six-year term; the National Action Party (PAN) 25 and the Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD), 8.

“At that time, they wanted to practice a two-party system, the PRI and the PAN. Which was the same. It turned out that this happened in '95, explained AMLO.

The president pointed out that the Senate now consists of 60 people Moraine9 legislators from the Workers' Party, 14 from the Green Ecological Party of Mexico (PVEM), 5 from the Civic Movement, 22 from the PAN and 16 from the PRI. Morenista ensured this Zedillo has no moral authority to talk about democracy.