sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0 sk0

Marcin Napiórkowski: We are at war. The Museum of Polish History must respond to this

Why would a cultural semiotician need to be the director of the Museum of Polish History? Is this a dream come true?

This question can be reversed: why does the Museum of Polish History need a cultural semiotician? Can I be of use here? Remains to be seen. Does anyone need to repeat it, who also said it in a previous conversation with you (“It's not savages who need myths, only us”, “Plus Minus”, 20-21 July 2024), how important depolarization is, dialogue? Suddenly, despite my intentions, I became an icon of political polarization. That's not my dream, just like I don't dream of managing a cultural institution. I was asked if I was ready to take responsibility for this reality.



Source link

Leave a Comment