Castilla y León will file an “immediate” and “vigorous” lawsuit against the amnesty in the Constitutional Court

Amnesty Act in the month of November 2023 and, without waiting for its publication in the Government Gazette, today, as the standard goes through the process in Congress, emphasizes that the final proposal of The demand before the Constitutional Court will be “immediate” and “strong”. within a maximum period of three months, which is the legal limit according to the Organic Law of the Constitution, from the moment it is published in the BOE.

Naturally, the preparation of the final proposal, which will have to be submitted to the Government Council, must first be done through the Government Council. judgment of the Advisory Council, which is mandatory but not bindingthat is, if it would conflict with the presentation, it will be “reviewed,” said the Counselor to the Presidency, Luis Miguel González Gagobut without ensuring that they would resign if the Castilla y León Consultative report were to the contrary.

Unconstitutionality for the BOE

González Gago, who did not want to put forward the details of his demand until the final proposal is approved by the Mañueco government, stated that “there are important legal elements and arguments that point to the flagrant violation of the rule of law and the principle of equality and constitutes an unavoidable attack on the Constitution” in the text.

However, he acknowledged that until the standard approved today by the Congress of Delegates is published in the BOE, “the latest definition” of the amnesty law cannot be verified, and he also acknowledged that “Every word is important.” In this sense, he points out that the Consultation Report, for which this autonomous body has a period of twenty days once the text is sent to it, can propose to delete, change or add something, and “it will be adapted.”

“We will do it as quickly as possible and with all urgency, of course taking into account the internal deadlines, but always before the three months have expired,” he concluded.

However, Gago, without prior reading from the BOE, defined the lawsuit proposal they have been working on since November – “in the definition of the football field we understand is being desecrated” – as “very powerful and with very serious arguments that,” he understands, “it will be difficult for the Constitutional Court not to have to make an in-depth analysis.”

Regarding the possibility of arranging a joint lawsuit with other autonomous communities that also plan to appeal, González Gago rejected that option because, he said, each will have its own arguments.

Power without amnesty

The verdict, announced yesterday, until ten months in prison for eight ranchers convicted for the altercations that took place last year in front of the building of the Territorial Delegation of the Junta in Salamanca during the protest against bovine tuberculosis, the spokesperson for the Board of Directors, Carlos Fernández Carriedoto return to the issue of the Catalan amnesty.

Asked for his assessment of the case, Carriedo referred to the attacks on national police officers for which farmers from Salamanca have been convicted during the attempted attack on the autonomous government building in that province, comparing them to the events of the day itself illegal referendum in Catalonia.

“We ask the government,” he said, “that in any initiative involving attacks on state security forces and bodies act with the same vigor that in this case, regardless of the autonomous community in which these events take place, without amnesty regarding these attacks.”

Source link

Leave a Comment

AcUk AcUk AcUk AcUk AcUk AcUk AcUk AcUk AcUk AcUk AcUk AcUk AcUk AcUk AcUk AcUk AcUk AcUk AcUk AcUk AcUk AcUk AcUk AcUk AcUk AcUk AcUk AcUk