Supreme Court rejects amnesty for embezzlement of 'trials'

The House of Representatives frustrates the plans of the independentists: Junqueras remains disqualified and Puigdemont's arrest warrant remains in force

The magistrates believe that the crime is excluded from the law: there was unlawful enrichment, even though the money that went to the consultation was not in his pocket

The 1-O defendants, during the trial at the Supreme Court

Nati Villanueva

01-07-2024

Updated at 12:58 PM

The obscurity of the 'processes' cannot be erased. This was stated on Monday by the lower chamber of the Supreme Court in an order refusing to apply the amnesty law to those convicted of 1-O who remain disqualified, including Oriol Junqueras.

The magistrates They thereby disown the lieutenant prosecutor of the Supreme CourtMaría Ángeles Sánchez Conde, and, in line with the prosecutors to whom García Ortiz removed from the cause of the denial 'process' To apply the law, they claim that the actions of the independence leaders involved personal enrichment that the amnesty law itself precludes.

The criteria of the ICC results in a domino effect for Puigdemont and the rest of the fugitives that Judge Llarena has prosecuted, who in another order also communicated this Monday, maintains the national arrest warrants that weigh on Puigdemont and the other fugitives: if they set foot on Spanish territory, they will be arrested.

The Supreme Court's decision has unforeseeable consequences for the Sánchez government, whose appointment by the independentistas was conditional on the approval of this law. stain of unconstitutionality They've been complaining since day one.


Source link

Leave a Comment

url url url url url url url url url